<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Dudespaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dudespaper.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dudespaper.com</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Blathering About...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by The Dudespaper</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dudespaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>sorry, incorrect use of a posteriori. a priori is what i should have said.

oh and jj, i do see that i totally misread your comment. retracted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, incorrect use of a posteriori. a priori is what i should have said.</p>
<p>oh and jj, i do see that i totally misread your comment. retracted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Dudenheim Museum Tee Shirt Shop! by Willie</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/the-dudenheim-museum-tee-shirt-shop.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/the-dudenheim-museum-tee-shirt-shop.html/#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Ok I quit smoking weed 5 years ago. I been really fucking real. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s done me any good. I just got good and bored, not to mention I now take paxil and sleeping pills everyday.
I&#039;ve been thinking lately about getting some weed and just saying fuck it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I quit smoking weed 5 years ago. I been really fucking real. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s done me any good. I just got good and bored, not to mention I now take paxil and sleeping pills everyday.<br />
I&#8217;ve been thinking lately about getting some weed and just saying fuck it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by The Dudespaper</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dudespaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2218</guid>
		<description>the evolutionists generally refute that argument by saying that if you can always position some all-powerful explainer a posteriori, then you&#039;re left the realm of rational argument. it only moves the question back by bringing up the question - how did god get there? it&#039;s turtles all the way down. the pastafarians lampoon this idea very well - claiming that any time questions of logic come up that seem to refute the existence of the spaghetti monster, it&#039;s actually his noodly appendage messing with the data to confound us on purpose.

It should be mentioned of course that evolutionary theory doesn&#039;t really have anything to do with Dudeism. Nor does God. Dudeism makes no claims about theology or science. And this article only argued that Darwin was a dude. In this context, our individual opinions on God and science are just our opinions, man. 

Dudeism is about the poetic and perceived &quot;way&quot; of &quot;making this life significant&quot; (Roger Ames&#039; translation of the title of the &quot;Tao Te Ching.&quot;) It is fundamentally humanistic. Thus, if questions about God and cosmology and science come up, then they should be looked at only metaphorically or poetically. Their literal truth or falsehood should have no bearing on our Dude worldview. Dontcha think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the evolutionists generally refute that argument by saying that if you can always position some all-powerful explainer a posteriori, then you&#8217;re left the realm of rational argument. it only moves the question back by bringing up the question &#8211; how did god get there? it&#8217;s turtles all the way down. the pastafarians lampoon this idea very well &#8211; claiming that any time questions of logic come up that seem to refute the existence of the spaghetti monster, it&#8217;s actually his noodly appendage messing with the data to confound us on purpose.</p>
<p>It should be mentioned of course that evolutionary theory doesn&#8217;t really have anything to do with Dudeism. Nor does God. Dudeism makes no claims about theology or science. And this article only argued that Darwin was a dude. In this context, our individual opinions on God and science are just our opinions, man. </p>
<p>Dudeism is about the poetic and perceived &#8220;way&#8221; of &#8220;making this life significant&#8221; (Roger Ames&#8217; translation of the title of the &#8220;Tao Te Ching.&#8221;) It is fundamentally humanistic. Thus, if questions about God and cosmology and science come up, then they should be looked at only metaphorically or poetically. Their literal truth or falsehood should have no bearing on our Dude worldview. Dontcha think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by Rev. Ed C</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Ed C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t see why evolution rules out intelligent design.  If anything you could make an argument that it proves it.  I mean, sure, it&#039;s at odds with Zionist Creationist mythology but the fact is the concept of a god would mean that the complexities of the universe are nothing to them, and, should there be one/some it&#039;s more likely (in my humblist of opinions) that we&#039;d be part of an evolving idea, like working with any toy building blocks, or modelling clay.  I don&#039;t see things as a duality, there&#039;s an infinate set of possibilities out there, we just don&#039;t know, dudes.

I mean, Darwin was a scientist, not a philosopher, he set out to discover what was.  Darwin I like, Dawkins really pee&#039;s me off, he&#039;s like the atheist version of a radical cleric (yeah, I consider atheism a religion, I mean, it&#039;s a faith in an ideal, right?), the man&#039;s got a beef against organist religion and he uses people&#039;s modern belief in the lack of godliness as a front for his own shit.  Darwin can be a Dude but Dawkins is the Anti-Dude if ever I saw one... man, I can&#039;t abide that guy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t see why evolution rules out intelligent design.  If anything you could make an argument that it proves it.  I mean, sure, it&#8217;s at odds with Zionist Creationist mythology but the fact is the concept of a god would mean that the complexities of the universe are nothing to them, and, should there be one/some it&#8217;s more likely (in my humblist of opinions) that we&#8217;d be part of an evolving idea, like working with any toy building blocks, or modelling clay.  I don&#8217;t see things as a duality, there&#8217;s an infinate set of possibilities out there, we just don&#8217;t know, dudes.</p>
<p>I mean, Darwin was a scientist, not a philosopher, he set out to discover what was.  Darwin I like, Dawkins really pee&#8217;s me off, he&#8217;s like the atheist version of a radical cleric (yeah, I consider atheism a religion, I mean, it&#8217;s a faith in an ideal, right?), the man&#8217;s got a beef against organist religion and he uses people&#8217;s modern belief in the lack of godliness as a front for his own shit.  Darwin can be a Dude but Dawkins is the Anti-Dude if ever I saw one&#8230; man, I can&#8217;t abide that guy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TheToiletPaper.com Dude De Ching Giveaway #2 by josh</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>thetoiletpaper.com is cool!  i signed up with them last contest and have become an avid fan since!  thanx dudes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thetoiletpaper.com is cool!  i signed up with them last contest and have become an avid fan since!  thanx dudes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TheToiletPaper.com Dude De Ching Giveaway #2 by Doctor Joe</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>Forget the contests and just buy the book. The proceeds go to a worthy cause and helps spread the Dudeism word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget the contests and just buy the book. The proceeds go to a worthy cause and helps spread the Dudeism word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by The Dudespaper</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dudespaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>hey jj,
i&#039;d love to hear more about what you&#039;re alluding to. but i&#039;m afraid i don&#039;t quite get the gist. forgive me for possibly misinterpreting your message. it sounded to me like you were taking the transcendental route, which seems to create a dualism all its own - that is, that there is a natural and a supernatural - a transcendent and an imminent. but it still sounds like a top down ghost-in-the-machine approach, at least the way you&#039;ve articulated it. and that&#039;s cool. that&#039;s cool.

just curious what it is that peeves you about darwin/evolution. that&#039;s the thing i don&#039;t really get.

your two cents more than welcome, but if you want to throw in a few more cents that&#039;d be great too. it sounds like you&#039;re taking a bit of offense though. no hard intended. this is a family restaurant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey jj,<br />
i&#8217;d love to hear more about what you&#8217;re alluding to. but i&#8217;m afraid i don&#8217;t quite get the gist. forgive me for possibly misinterpreting your message. it sounded to me like you were taking the transcendental route, which seems to create a dualism all its own &#8211; that is, that there is a natural and a supernatural &#8211; a transcendent and an imminent. but it still sounds like a top down ghost-in-the-machine approach, at least the way you&#8217;ve articulated it. and that&#8217;s cool. that&#8217;s cool.</p>
<p>just curious what it is that peeves you about darwin/evolution. that&#8217;s the thing i don&#8217;t really get.</p>
<p>your two cents more than welcome, but if you want to throw in a few more cents that&#8217;d be great too. it sounds like you&#8217;re taking a bit of offense though. no hard intended. this is a family restaurant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by J.J. Vicars</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J. Vicars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised my response would be interpreted that way. My comment makes no sense when still stuck on the duality or creationism-or-not. I made no mention at all of &quot;top-down organization&quot; nor did I use the word &#039;preordained&#039;. The organization I&#039;m talking about, if it needs to be labeled this way, would be &quot;in-out&quot;. The &#039;invisible world&#039; creates and supports the &#039;visible world&#039; of space/time. Conciousness creates form. There&#039;s some quantum physics in there. 

Whatever, dude. I added my two cents to the discussion and clarified when deemed necessary. That&#039;s plenty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised my response would be interpreted that way. My comment makes no sense when still stuck on the duality or creationism-or-not. I made no mention at all of &#8220;top-down organization&#8221; nor did I use the word &#8216;preordained&#8217;. The organization I&#8217;m talking about, if it needs to be labeled this way, would be &#8220;in-out&#8221;. The &#8216;invisible world&#8217; creates and supports the &#8216;visible world&#8217; of space/time. Conciousness creates form. There&#8217;s some quantum physics in there. </p>
<p>Whatever, dude. I added my two cents to the discussion and clarified when deemed necessary. That&#8217;s plenty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by The Dudespaper</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dudespaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>Hey JJ
You disappoint me! How could you say that Darwin said that life was a mere coincidence devoid of any meaning?

I find it infinitely puzzling that people fine more meaning in a top-down approach to explain the world than a bottom-up one. For me the bottom up explanation is a tale of true adventure and beauty, and the notion that there is an organizing top-down principle to explain the world is hopelessly simplistic and dull.

Taoism is far more in line with Darwin and the theory of evolution than any creationist ever could be. Taoism supports the notion that there is a flow and development to life - not that it is predetermined, but that it unfolds naturally and in a myriad number of ways, all of them ultimately good, but not preordained.

Evolution in fact showed that man is vehemently not at the top of the pyramid, but a side branch of a growing bush. 

It&#039;s a shame that the actual poetry of the theory of evolution isn&#039;t something that people were taught in school or encouraged to discuss openly. The consequence is that most people don&#039;t actually understand what it&#039;s all about. It&#039;s far more beautiful, fascinating and complicated than the talking heads on TV would have you believe. It&#039;s not a linear process with man on the top. It is in many ways in line with the mythological understanding of the world purveyed by Joseph Campbell - it&#039;s a journey of heroic genes. 

But then, what&#039;s a hee-ro? That&#039;s the real question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JJ<br />
You disappoint me! How could you say that Darwin said that life was a mere coincidence devoid of any meaning?</p>
<p>I find it infinitely puzzling that people fine more meaning in a top-down approach to explain the world than a bottom-up one. For me the bottom up explanation is a tale of true adventure and beauty, and the notion that there is an organizing top-down principle to explain the world is hopelessly simplistic and dull.</p>
<p>Taoism is far more in line with Darwin and the theory of evolution than any creationist ever could be. Taoism supports the notion that there is a flow and development to life &#8211; not that it is predetermined, but that it unfolds naturally and in a myriad number of ways, all of them ultimately good, but not preordained.</p>
<p>Evolution in fact showed that man is vehemently not at the top of the pyramid, but a side branch of a growing bush. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the actual poetry of the theory of evolution isn&#8217;t something that people were taught in school or encouraged to discuss openly. The consequence is that most people don&#8217;t actually understand what it&#8217;s all about. It&#8217;s far more beautiful, fascinating and complicated than the talking heads on TV would have you believe. It&#8217;s not a linear process with man on the top. It is in many ways in line with the mythological understanding of the world purveyed by Joseph Campbell &#8211; it&#8217;s a journey of heroic genes. </p>
<p>But then, what&#8217;s a hee-ro? That&#8217;s the real question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: George Carlin by J.J. Vicars</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-george-carlin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J. Vicars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-george-carlin.html/#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>George Carlin was my public voice. No poltician, ever. Just Carlin. He verbalized the anger and animosity I have towards my country and it&#039;s brainwashed, limp-dicked citizens better than anyone. He was, and still is, the needed voice of rage and scorn. This is not &quot;rebel without a cause&quot; rage and scorn. This is contempt for the self-righteous and the hypocritical. This is seething at Big Business who rapes our land and others to feed their own monkey, who drive down wages and benefits to increase their bonuses. This is disgust with a knee-jerk reactionary public who continues to support war-mongering, corporate-sponsored talking heads because &quot;he&#039;s one of us&quot; whether Right or Left. This is not hiding behind Pacifism.

George Carlin&#039;s The Ten Commandments, Who Really Controls America and You Have No Rights sums it all up. If you&#039;re not pissed off you&#039;re not paying attention. His was the last voice of reason. The big guns seem to have won, just as they won against the Indians a long time ago and in other people&#039;s countries to this day. All a Dude can do now is retreat from the madness, like Yoda and Obi-Wan in STAR WARS, and wait for ripe time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Carlin was my public voice. No poltician, ever. Just Carlin. He verbalized the anger and animosity I have towards my country and it&#8217;s brainwashed, limp-dicked citizens better than anyone. He was, and still is, the needed voice of rage and scorn. This is not &#8220;rebel without a cause&#8221; rage and scorn. This is contempt for the self-righteous and the hypocritical. This is seething at Big Business who rapes our land and others to feed their own monkey, who drive down wages and benefits to increase their bonuses. This is disgust with a knee-jerk reactionary public who continues to support war-mongering, corporate-sponsored talking heads because &#8220;he&#8217;s one of us&#8221; whether Right or Left. This is not hiding behind Pacifism.</p>
<p>George Carlin&#8217;s The Ten Commandments, Who Really Controls America and You Have No Rights sums it all up. If you&#8217;re not pissed off you&#8217;re not paying attention. His was the last voice of reason. The big guns seem to have won, just as they won against the Indians a long time ago and in other people&#8217;s countries to this day. All a Dude can do now is retreat from the madness, like Yoda and Obi-Wan in STAR WARS, and wait for ripe time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great Dudes in History: Charles Darwin by J.J. Vicars</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J. Vicars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/great-dudes-in-history-charles-darwin.html/#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with McNuggetz on this one. How can a group such as this champion a guy who basically said life is a mere coincidence devoid of any meaning? I thought Dudeism was influenced by Taoism? Typical Western duality of God/noGod. Problem is &quot;God&quot; is still thought of as &quot;the invisible man who lives in the sky&quot;. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts and something we can never completely comprehend. The other problem is literal translation; religion is supposed to be metaphor to guide personal experience, not historical fact. Joseph Campbell did great work in this area but of course reactionaries won&#039;t hear of it, still gonna argue over whether or not there&#039;s an invisible man.

The whole thing is just another part of Man&#039;s feeling of superiority. Whether through religion or evolution humamns still think they&#039;re at the top of the heap. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Noody shits in their own backyard like this species. If anything, we&#039;re collectively at the bottom of the heap for arrogantly making such waste of our potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with McNuggetz on this one. How can a group such as this champion a guy who basically said life is a mere coincidence devoid of any meaning? I thought Dudeism was influenced by Taoism? Typical Western duality of God/noGod. Problem is &#8220;God&#8221; is still thought of as &#8220;the invisible man who lives in the sky&#8221;. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts and something we can never completely comprehend. The other problem is literal translation; religion is supposed to be metaphor to guide personal experience, not historical fact. Joseph Campbell did great work in this area but of course reactionaries won&#8217;t hear of it, still gonna argue over whether or not there&#8217;s an invisible man.</p>
<p>The whole thing is just another part of Man&#8217;s feeling of superiority. Whether through religion or evolution humamns still think they&#8217;re at the top of the heap. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Noody shits in their own backyard like this species. If anything, we&#8217;re collectively at the bottom of the heap for arrogantly making such waste of our potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TheToiletPaper.com Dude De Ching Giveaway #2 by John Smith</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/thetoiletpaper-com-dude-de-ching-giveaway-2.html/#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>My life is so uncool right now,I could really do with a copy of the Dude De Ching Book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My life is so uncool right now,I could really do with a copy of the Dude De Ching Book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep on the Sunny Side by Doctor Joe</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/keep-on-the-sunny-side.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/keep-on-the-sunny-side.html/#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>I see a similarity between George Clooney and his &#039;Dapper Dan&#039; and the Dude with his White Russians? Perhaps they are cosmically related?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a similarity between George Clooney and his &#8216;Dapper Dan&#8217; and the Dude with his White Russians? Perhaps they are cosmically related?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vote for Jeff Bridges! by Mother Duderior</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/vote-for-jeff-bridges.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mother Duderior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/vote-for-jeff-bridges.html/#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on a click fest....I&#039;m souped up on White Russians, beer and and total despisement of snotty-nosed adolescent eejits who think they can sing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on a click fest&#8230;.I&#8217;m souped up on White Russians, beer and and total despisement of snotty-nosed adolescent eejits who think they can sing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Don&#8217;t Draw Shit, Lebowski by Duncan</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/you-dont-draw-shit-lebowski.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/you-dont-draw-shit-lebowski.html/#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>Ah... just keep checking back... there&#039;ll be more off and on... on off... and on...
http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1214</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; just keep checking back&#8230; there&#8217;ll be more off and on&#8230; on off&#8230; and on&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1214" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1214</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dudeism.com&#8217;s Real-Life &#8216;Little Lebowski Urban Achievers&#8217; Fund by revgms</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/dudeism-coms-real-life-little-lebowski-urban-achievers-fund.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>revgms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/dudeism-coms-real-life-little-lebowski-urban-achievers-fund.html/#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>Far out man! Just ordered two Dude De Ching books.

Cheers Dudes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far out man! Just ordered two Dude De Ching books.</p>
<p>Cheers Dudes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Don&#8217;t Draw Shit, Lebowski by Duncan</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/you-dont-draw-shit-lebowski.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/you-dont-draw-shit-lebowski.html/#comment-2166</guid>
		<description>Yup... this one too! http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1213</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230; this one too! <a href="http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1213" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaesye.com/?p=1213</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Happy, You Crazy Fuck? by rangerdude</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>rangerdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>I was going to get around to it, but I got talked into going to an interpretive dance recital &amp; then had an emergency call and had to go fix Cherry&#039;s cable.  After that &amp; a few Caucasions later, I woke up on the rug listening to my cassette of the classic Buzz Fazio/Don Carter match from 1960. By then, well fuck it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to get around to it, but I got talked into going to an interpretive dance recital &amp; then had an emergency call and had to go fix Cherry&#8217;s cable.  After that &amp; a few Caucasions later, I woke up on the rug listening to my cassette of the classic Buzz Fazio/Don Carter match from 1960. By then, well fuck it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Happy, You Crazy Fuck? by asa</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>asa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>just gotta chill, it might not make you happy, but it&#039;ll sure help other people out, let&#039;s go bowling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just gotta chill, it might not make you happy, but it&#8217;ll sure help other people out, let&#8217;s go bowling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You Happy, You Crazy Fuck? by Doctor Joe</title>
		<link>http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/comment-page-1/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dudespaper.com/are-you-happy-you-crazy-fuck.html/#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>Way too many ins and outs. Gave me brain freeze. I think I&#039;ll go bowling and let it sort itself out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way too many ins and outs. Gave me brain freeze. I think I&#8217;ll go bowling and let it sort itself out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
